|
02-03-2013, 03:06 PM
|
|
Higher Than Most
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,939
|
|
Re: Morgan's 2004 ranger
the only thing with the chevy pack is dont you have to move your hangers and stuff? and then if you end up going to f31 or g50 or whatever you have to move them again... but heck since you got them for free, its probably not a super big deal.
__________________
2006 Ford Ranger
V6 3.AWESOME 5 Speed
3" Fabtech spindle lift
32" Falken Wild Peak A/T
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2004xlmiller
"Cant tell if gay or cali member"
|
|
Register and never see these ads again. |
|
02-03-2013, 03:12 PM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12,688
|
|
Re: Morgan's 2004 ranger
yea the front hanger gets pushed forward. the rear should be moved back as well. if i do end up with some g50s its 4 bolts per side to move the hanger back to stock position, not a big deal to me. looking forward to having a longer leaf and a better ride.
|
02-03-2013, 03:13 PM
|
|
Higher Than Most
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,939
|
|
Re: Morgan's 2004 ranger
ok just checking, your just bolting it in so its not like you have to redo welds and crap, you can just bolt it back to stock which probably would take 15 mins todo.
__________________
2006 Ford Ranger
V6 3.AWESOME 5 Speed
3" Fabtech spindle lift
32" Falken Wild Peak A/T
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2004xlmiller
"Cant tell if gay or cali member"
|
|
02-04-2013, 10:59 AM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12,688
|
|
Re: Morgan's 2004 ranger
shouldnt take too long at all. got my W2 from work finally, so i can start the process to get my damn tax return. might go out and buy some new rims and tires, might sit on the cash for a bit, might go spend it on hookers and blow. who knows.
|
02-04-2013, 11:09 AM
|
|
Everybody Loves Me
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,565
|
|
I vote hookers and blow but I like the finer things in life.. that can kill you lol
__________________
1993 Twin stick XLT 4.0L. 3.73 8.8LS LED's here and there. Plasti-dip lower half. Sony HU. Image Dynamic 5x7 all around. 12" Sony sub. 200,000 club
Build Thread
|
02-04-2013, 11:35 AM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12,688
|
|
Re: Morgan's 2004 ranger
im always game for shit that can kill you.
|
02-04-2013, 11:51 AM
|
|
Canadian Baja Champion
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,401
|
|
Re: Morgan's 2004 ranger
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2004xlmiller
id probably be happy with 8k. starting at 9 tho.
|
so your building your truck, are about half way there, and then your plan is to sell it for 8K?
RUFUKINUTS?
build it to keep it, or sell it now and pocket the cash.
|
02-04-2013, 12:01 PM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12,688
|
|
Re: Morgan's 2004 ranger
dont apply logic, it'll never work.
|
02-04-2013, 12:02 PM
|
|
Canadian Baja Champion
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,401
|
|
Re: Morgan's 2004 ranger
Good point. No idea what the hell i was thinking there.
Im ok now.
Carry on.
|
02-04-2013, 12:12 PM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12,688
|
|
Re: Morgan's 2004 ranger
|
02-05-2013, 11:30 AM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12,688
|
|
Re: Morgan's 2004 ranger
rear bilsteins are on their way, fiberglass fenders shipped out yesterday, and my 8.8 will be ready soon. what 35s should i get with my taxes fellas im thinkin bfg a/ts again since they last forever, but the mt-r is sick
|
02-05-2013, 11:52 AM
|
|
Ford Motor Co
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 174
|
|
I would go with the falken wild peaks or a toyo at. Personally I don't like my bfg ATS. No grip in the wet, suck in the sand even at 5-10 psi, but they don't shred when you crack a rim.
__________________
1998 Ranger XLT
3.slow Auto
"One-off" mid travel kit pulling 14" of travel.
Bedcage with 2.0x14" Bilsteins
30" BFG AT's soon to be replaced with 33s of some sort.
|
02-05-2013, 11:55 AM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12,688
|
|
Re: Morgan's 2004 ranger
you really are a little slow.. my bfgs have been nothing but outstanding. the falkens are nice but dont do shit in mud. and toyos are dead at half life.
|
|
|
|
02-05-2013, 12:02 PM
|
|
Ford Motor Co
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 174
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2004xlmiller
you really are a little slow.. my bfgs have been nothing but outstanding. the falkens are nice but dont do shit in mud. and toyos are dead at half life.
|
I don't do mud so I could really care less about mud performance. I drive mainly street so wild peaks or whatever the falken at is, is ideal for me. Plus a few people who beat their trucks (tvoymang/cuz_Im_cr) have had them and never had issues. My bfgs have only lasted roughly 40k miles and I've had two replaced because of side wall punctures and small ass nails in the tread. Nothing I've read about them says they're a good tire. Every tire thread on DR has said they suck compared to others for whatever reason.
And whatever the toyo at is, it just looks badass.
__________________
1998 Ranger XLT
3.slow Auto
"One-off" mid travel kit pulling 14" of travel.
Bedcage with 2.0x14" Bilsteins
30" BFG AT's soon to be replaced with 33s of some sort.
|
|
|
|
02-05-2013, 12:03 PM
|
|
Everybody Loves Me
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,565
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2004xlmiller
you really are a little slow.. my bfgs have been nothing but outstanding. the falkens are nice but dont do shit in mud. and toyos are dead at half life.
|
This. Falcons are good for someone only on a dirt road... in the dry. Bfgs are awesome all around tire end of story. Morgan you gonna get the km2s??
__________________
1993 Twin stick XLT 4.0L. 3.73 8.8LS LED's here and there. Plasti-dip lower half. Sony HU. Image Dynamic 5x7 all around. 12" Sony sub. 200,000 club
Build Thread
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|