Quote:
Originally Posted by guell
That b25 wasn't doing 300 mph though, it would have actively been trying to avoid hitting the Empire State Building. While the 767's that hit the twin towers were going 470mph. Do you want me to get into the weight differences? A b25 had a max limit of roughly 42k, while a completely loaded 767 has a capacity of almost 400k. Do you really want to talk physics of this???
The 767 also carries a lot more fuel.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
|
We could, it would just bring more to light in either case I am sure.
I wasnt exactly trying to equate the exact specifications as its clearly evident the plane sizes will change drastically everything from fuel loads to mass index; much as alluding to the thought process that same and similar events yet way opposite outcomes.
I doubt other than some logic and minimal experiences of my own would I be able to hold a candle to the 2600 people as; Architects, Pilots, Physics professors, Construction Engineers, Civil engineers, Pilot trainers, Former Military Seniors, Material analysts, those who built & designed the Twin towers, among other professional and well respected individuals who make up an organization that unanimously states; Ain't no fuckin way.." Just saying. Oh and lets not forget about the disclosure on this fun declassified tid-bit.
https://catalog.archives.gov/id/305036
More summarized versions:
-
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Op...orthwoods.html
-
https://io9.gizmodo.com/5838778/oper...acks-on-the-us
You make it sound like I am insinuating that nothing happened. What I am SAYING is that the shit was an inside job, just like most of these random terrorist acts, domestic or otherwise. I would assume you are close in age and probably remember when such acts were committed at airports, mostly in the middle east areas or Mediterranean bordered countries and Africa where hijacking planes never really panned out or even left the ground. There are more things that DON'T add up tot eh official narrative in so many instances based upon logic and physics, mostly better than my aforementioned comparison of two aircrafts.
But its not so cut and dry on that level either. Even if we take into full consideration a larger plane. When the two towers that make up the World Trade Center were built, they were designed to withstand the impact of the largest airliner of the day, the Boeing 707 Intercontinental.
Note the size of a 707 (far right) and the 767 (2nd from far left).. not too much in size but def a larger fuselage. Smaller width in wings than a 707 and the 707 also is a 4 engine aircraft v 2 engines on the 767.
And WELL, lets look at the destructive nature of just meek geese in comparison to Airliners compared to at the time of their completion. The videos offered below were almost comical in comparison considering size, velocity and speeds, VS the standing still "Twin Towers"—the original 1 World Trade Center, at 1,368 feet (417 m); and 2 World Trade Center, at 1,362 feet (415.1 m)—were the tallest buildings in the world and both towers were 208ft x 208ft.
https://www.youtube.com/results?sear...s+on+airplanes
SOURCE:
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/...d_Trade_Center
So now comes into play the structure.. And we've seen all the arguments of jet fuel burning at 1840 degrees vs 2600 degrees needed to melt steel. But we agree that planes DID in fact hit the TT but where we will likley disagree is in the facts given that the TT did NOT collapse based upon those aircraft alone, they were a precursor to what was already staged. Again we'll get into a MONEY trail afterwards but you cannot tell me that there arent other questions that arise in your mind after seeing this information.
Even the Pentagon.. Aired once, NEVER again
I am sure there are things we will disagree on as well agree with but you have to ask yourself what do you be-LIE-ve really?
.