|
01-13-2015, 01:14 AM
|
|
Lil' Red
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6,368
|
|
"Ford Performance" lineup
__________________
2002 ford ranger FX4 Off Road | 4.0l v6 | Flowmaster 40 S/I D/O | JBA Headers | Rebello Racing cams | port and polished heads | K&n Drop-in filter | TwinStick | 31 Spline 4.10 Torsen rear diff | Alcoa rims | Sitting on 31's|
|
Register and never see these ads again. |
|
01-13-2015, 03:58 PM
|
|
Mr H....A....P...P....Y👿
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,911
|
|
Re: "Ford Performance" lineup
600 horsepower 3.5 liter.
__________________
2014 F150 xl 3.7 6 speed auto.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pk9298
HELL TO THE NO!! Abort abort abort!! That's the first thing to go!!! Ewwwww! I'm not no vampire! I don't enjoy red tea
|
|
01-13-2015, 04:14 PM
|
|
Lil' Red
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6,368
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stateranger
600 horsepower 3.5 liter.
|
Yeah I know. I think it's because they limit engine size in LeMans.
__________________
2002 ford ranger FX4 Off Road | 4.0l v6 | Flowmaster 40 S/I D/O | JBA Headers | Rebello Racing cams | port and polished heads | K&n Drop-in filter | TwinStick | 31 Spline 4.10 Torsen rear diff | Alcoa rims | Sitting on 31's|
|
01-13-2015, 07:37 PM
|
|
Tank Diver
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,129
|
|
Re: "Ford Performance" lineup
All I can remember is the big turbo craze in the 80's. I don't think many of those engines lived to see the 90's. Not to mention most turbos that are around these days require premium fuel. Negating any fuel saving benefits the turbo gives. Granted, none of the above vehicles were ever meant to be fuel savers and a V-6 engine can be on hell of a beast. Time will tell how the power plants hold up.
__________________
Sgtsandman's Work in Progress
2011 Ranger XLT, 4X4, 4 door Super Cab. 4.0L, 5 Speed M50D-R1HD, 3.73:1, 8.8" open differential, Jason Pace cap
2019 Ford Ranger STX FX4, Super Crew, 2.3L Ecoboost, 10 speed automatic, 3.73:1 with rear locker, Leer 100XR cap
|
01-14-2015, 01:31 AM
|
|
Lil' Red
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6,368
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtsandman
All I can remember is the big turbo craze in the 80's. I don't think many of those engines lived to see the 90's. Not to mention most turbos that are around these days require premium fuel. Negating any fuel saving benefits the turbo gives. Granted, none of the above vehicles were ever meant to be fuel savers and a V-6 engine can be on hell of a beast. Time will tell how the power plants hold up.
|
Advancement in materials technology is a key factor in longevity.
__________________
2002 ford ranger FX4 Off Road | 4.0l v6 | Flowmaster 40 S/I D/O | JBA Headers | Rebello Racing cams | port and polished heads | K&n Drop-in filter | TwinStick | 31 Spline 4.10 Torsen rear diff | Alcoa rims | Sitting on 31's|
|
01-14-2015, 05:05 PM
|
|
Chat ********* Overlord
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,614
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtsandman
All I can remember is the big turbo craze in the 80's. I don't think many of those engines lived to see the 90's. Not to mention most turbos that are around these days require premium fuel. Negating any fuel saving benefits the turbo gives. Granted, none of the above vehicles were ever meant to be fuel savers and a V-6 engine can be on hell of a beast. Time will tell how the power plants hold up.
|
Turbo motors back in the 80s required premium fuel back then too. I had an 86 turbo toyota 4x4 that was very reliable. My supercharged mr2 was very reliable.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_M12
My issue is the ecoturd, i dont think its worth a crap and ford seems to want to move to that compared to v8s
__________________
2011 Toyota Tundra 5.7 DC 4x4
Ranger free since 4/14/14
1972 bmw 2002tii
1974 Kawasaki mc1m 90
|
01-14-2015, 05:07 PM
|
|
dumpster fire
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,363
|
|
Re: "Ford Performance" lineup
my turbo mr2 was reliable too
__________________
2017 Ford Fiesta ST
2014 Ford Escape Titanium Ecoboost AWD
|
01-14-2015, 05:10 PM
|
|
ford dealer parts guy
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 20,938
|
|
Imo the issue was people who didn't know how to break in a turbo engine
__________________
2021 F150 5.0 Screw
Past:18 F150 2.7, 16 F150 5.0, 14 F150 5.0, 07 F150 5.4, 03 Ranger 4.0
Master Certified Ford Parts / Warranty Admin
|
01-14-2015, 05:44 PM
|
|
Ford Tough
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 280
|
|
The issue is weight, you have a lightweight ecoboost with all that horsepower being forced by twins. If I have a turbo engine itll be burning diesel. I have yet to drive an ecoboost that gets anywhere near good mpg's or pull a heavy load up a steep grade and not get hot.
__________________
1999 ranger ext cab 5 speed with 3.0
2012 3500 dodge cummins
|
01-14-2015, 05:53 PM
|
|
Chat ********* Overlord
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,614
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho99ranger
The issue is weight, you have a lightweight ecoboost with all that horsepower being forced by twins. If I have a turbo engine itll be burning diesel. I have yet to drive an ecoboost that gets anywhere near good mpg's or pull a heavy load up a steep grade and not get hot.
|
Like i said i never had issues with any of my boosted engines, but they werent ford trucks either. I love forced induction but in a pickup theres no replacement for a bigass v8
__________________
2011 Toyota Tundra 5.7 DC 4x4
Ranger free since 4/14/14
1972 bmw 2002tii
1974 Kawasaki mc1m 90
|
01-14-2015, 06:03 PM
|
|
Ford Tough
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 280
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by guell
Like i said i never had issues with any of my boosted engines, but they werent ford trucks either. I love forced induction but in a pickup theres no replacement for a bigass v8
|
ya that wasnt directed toward any type of lightweight vehicle, I have no experience with any of the cars.
__________________
1999 ranger ext cab 5 speed with 3.0
2012 3500 dodge cummins
|
01-14-2015, 06:05 PM
|
|
Tank Diver
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,129
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by guell
Turbo motors back in the 80s required premium fuel back then too. I had an 86 turbo toyota 4x4 that was very reliable. My supercharged mr2 was very reliable. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_M12 My issue is the ecoturd, i dont think its worth a crap and ford seems to want to move to that compared to v8s
|
Time will tell. Ford does seem to be going all in with the turbo. They have their place but I'm not so sure a gasoline engine in a truck is it. Just my opinion.
__________________
Sgtsandman's Work in Progress
2011 Ranger XLT, 4X4, 4 door Super Cab. 4.0L, 5 Speed M50D-R1HD, 3.73:1, 8.8" open differential, Jason Pace cap
2019 Ford Ranger STX FX4, Super Crew, 2.3L Ecoboost, 10 speed automatic, 3.73:1 with rear locker, Leer 100XR cap
|
01-14-2015, 06:05 PM
|
|
Mr H....A....P...P....Y👿
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,911
|
|
Re: "Ford Performance" lineup
Quote:
Originally Posted by djfllmn
Imo the issue was people who didn't know how to break in a turbo engine
|
And the maintenance over time is more important due to more moving parts, this always seemed to be the killer of many turbo lima engines from the 80s, just an observation of the ones I've seen you pull yards get and most aren't even salvageable.
__________________
2014 F150 xl 3.7 6 speed auto.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pk9298
HELL TO THE NO!! Abort abort abort!! That's the first thing to go!!! Ewwwww! I'm not no vampire! I don't enjoy red tea
|
Last edited by stateranger; 01-14-2015 at 06:29 PM.
|
01-14-2015, 06:09 PM
|
|
Chat ********* Overlord
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,614
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stateranger
And the maintenance over time is more important due to more moving parts, this always seemed to be the killer of many turbo lima engines from the 80s, just an observation of the ones I've seen you pull yards get and most are even salvageable.
|
Gotta let those turbos cool after a hard drive, so many people coked turbos because of that
__________________
2011 Toyota Tundra 5.7 DC 4x4
Ranger free since 4/14/14
1972 bmw 2002tii
1974 Kawasaki mc1m 90
|
01-14-2015, 06:39 PM
|
|
Mr H....A....P...P....Y👿
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,911
|
|
Re: "Ford Performance" lineup
Start doing that and that carbon crap ends up back in the engine as well.
__________________
2014 F150 xl 3.7 6 speed auto.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pk9298
HELL TO THE NO!! Abort abort abort!! That's the first thing to go!!! Ewwwww! I'm not no vampire! I don't enjoy red tea
|
|
|
|