I hate this kid! - Page 6

joldtown · #76 07-20-2010, 09:21 PM

I hate this kid who stole my secret FRF decoder ring. Now I can't see the cool pics that are posted when I'm at work. I hate this kid....

turbo · #77 07-21-2010, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mickblock

That's like buckets of mud compared to his, which looked like only mere handfuls.

it does!

in fact.. it looks *literally* like buckets of mud were thrown on the truck in anticipation of taking the picture. note, for instance, the presence of mud/water in the immediate area of the truck on the pavement, but no tire tracks leading to it. note, for instance, the lack of footprints in that mud leading from the (presumably unoccupied) truck. note, for instance, the translucent nature of the windshield, complete with a few clods of mud as well.

it seems obvious, to this trained observer, that this picture was staged. I was going to allow the possibility that the truck had been air-lifted from its mudding location to this patch of asphalt, but the overall lack of any obvious "wheel spray" along the sides of the vehicle, as is often seen on trucks returning from mudding, precluded the possibility that the truck had actually been in any sort of "mudding activity" (other than being pelted by buckets of mud) prior to the taking of this photograph. what say the untrained observers?

edgeman4.0 · #78 07-21-2010, 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbo

it does!

in fact.. it looks *literally* like buckets of mud were thrown on the truck in anticipation of taking the picture. note, for instance, the presence of mud/water in the immediate area of the truck on the pavement, but no tire tracks leading to it. note, for instance, the lack of footprints in that mud leading from the (presumably unoccupied) truck. note, for instance, the translucent nature of the windshield, complete with a few clods of mud as well.

it seems obvious, to this trained observer, that this picture was staged. I was going to allow the possibility that the truck had been air-lifted from its mudding location to this patch of asphalt, but the overall lack of any obvious "wheel spray" along the sides of the vehicle, as is often seen on trucks returning from mudding, precluded the possibility that the truck had actually been in any sort of "mudding activity" (other than being pelted by buckets of mud) prior to the taking of this photograph. what say the untrained observers?

^^i concur with stupid again.^^

FireRanger · #79 07-21-2010, 10:18 AM

Totally busted. This calls his entire story into question. His whole tale was based on this expedition into the mud and this picture was the evidence of said trip. Obviously the picture is a total lie. I wonder how much of the rest of the story is BS too.

More_Cowbell · #80 07-21-2010, 10:22 AM

well i have seen the car in question covered im mud too on facebook

2004Edge · #81 07-21-2010, 10:32 AM

hell that v8 makes his truck weigh more and would prob suck ass muddin and shit my 2wd goes through deeper no prob

More_Cowbell · #82 07-21-2010, 10:35 AM

the cars the one with a v8

05RangerEdge · #83 07-21-2010, 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbo

it does!

in fact.. it looks *literally* like buckets of mud were thrown on the truck in anticipation of taking the picture. note, for instance, the presence of mud/water in the immediate area of the truck on the pavement, but no tire tracks leading to it. note, for instance, the lack of footprints in that mud leading from the (presumably unoccupied) truck. note, for instance, the translucent nature of the windshield, complete with a few clods of mud as well.

it seems obvious, to this trained observer, that this picture was staged. I was going to allow the possibility that the truck had been air-lifted from its mudding location to this patch of asphalt, but the overall lack of any obvious "wheel spray" along the sides of the vehicle, as is often seen on trucks returning from mudding, precluded the possibility that the truck had actually been in any sort of "mudding activity" (other than being pelted by buckets of mud) prior to the taking of this photograph. what say the untrained observers?

HA LOL HA ha

I am more concerned with the fact that this thread gets more attention than it deserves. Credibility was lost on the first page IMO. I think RazorsEgde summed it up pretty well with his "Super cool story bro" comment (x2). Please read the OP and tell me again why we care??

DisturbedESV · #84 07-21-2010, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 05RangerEdge

I am more concerned with the fact that this thread gets more attention than it deserves. Credibility was lost on the first page IMO. I think RazorsEgde summed it up pretty well with his "Super cool story bro" comment (x2). Please read the OP and tell me again why we care??

Because some dingbat brought it back.... lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by edgeman4.0

revival!!

go.

edgeman4.0 · #85 07-21-2010, 06:47 PM

Hahaha dingbat? That's coming out of your Husbandry duties darling.lol

Johnbaum13 · #86 07-21-2010, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by turbo

it does!

in fact.. it looks *literally* like buckets of mud were thrown on the truck in anticipation of taking the picture. note, for instance, the presence of mud/water in the immediate area of the truck on the pavement, but no tire tracks leading to it. note, for instance, the lack of footprints in that mud leading from the (presumably unoccupied) truck. note, for instance, the translucent nature of the windshield, complete with a few clods of mud as well.

it seems obvious, to this trained observer, that this picture was staged. I was going to allow the possibility that the truck had been air-lifted from its mudding location to this patch of asphalt, but the overall lack of any obvious "wheel spray" along the sides of the vehicle, as is often seen on trucks returning from mudding, precluded the possibility that the truck had actually been in any sort of "mudding activity" (other than being pelted by buckets of mud) prior to the taking of this photograph. what say the untrained observers?

To your keen observation, I would like to add the completely clean pavement under the truck. If the mud on the ground had indeed dripped from the truck after he stopped, the the ground underneath would be soiled as well.

turbo · #87 07-21-2010, 07:15 PM

yes... i was going to mention the voids under the truck and in front of each of the visible tires, but it really wasn't necessary to continue on with the rest of everything else that is wrong between the picture and the story. good eye, though, john...

FireRanger · #88 07-21-2010, 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 90fordranger

now heres mine.

In addition to the fake mud evidence, it appears the left front wheel is about to fall off.

05RangerEdge · #89 07-22-2010, 05:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FireRanger

In addition to the fake mud evidence, it appears the left front wheel is about to fall off.

My thoughts exactly.

and if he drove it to this spot wouldnt we have some sort of wiper marks on the windshield. No visibility through th window means it was covered where it sits. Buckets sound suspect but with the way this story started I have a feeling we may go in the direction of "Ok you guys got me, the truth is I was parked there and a terodactyl took a shiz on my truck."

Demon-FX4 · #90 07-22-2010, 02:09 PM

agree with this completely but what if he tried to was it off there lol or was the mud dry and he threw water on it to make it wet for a pic and the wheel damn can someone say stop driving it before u kill someone with it falling of