|
05-31-2013, 09:11 AM
|
|
Ford Tough
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 281
|
|
3.0 Vs 4.0
So still on the hunt for my first ranger. I live in MN and really want the 4X4. can you guys give your opinions on 3.0 vs the 4.0? I keep hearing the 3.0 is a slug. But when shopping around I feel like the 3.0 is more popular. Also I keep hearing the 3.0 is a tank and will last forever. Thanks in advance for all your opinions!
|
Register and never see these ads again. |
|
05-31-2013, 10:08 AM
|
|
Simple Kind of Man
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 6,604
|
|
Both are very reliable motors as long as you treat them correctly. The 4.0 is the way to go. The 3.0 isn't as bad as people claim it to be. It definatly has significantly less power but I never found it to be an issue. Go 4.0 if you can, but 3.0's are alright also.
__________________
2019 Ford Ranger Lariat Sport Fx4 Crew Cab
2014 Ford F150 STX Sport 4x4 TRADED
2006 Ford Ranger Ext cab 4x4 TRADED
1999 Ford Ranger Reg cab 2wd SOLD
|
05-31-2013, 10:28 AM
|
|
Former Ford Migrane Owner
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 933
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by beef_stew
Both are very reliable motors as long as you treat them correctly. The 4.0 is the way to go. The 3.0 isn't as bad as people claim it to be. It definatly has significantly less power but I never found it to be an issue. Go 4.0 if you can, but 3.0's are alright also.
|
They ARE as bad as people claim. Lol. I had a 3.0 and it is a DOOOGGG. Bullet-proof engine, extremely reliable. But you find yourself flooring it to go up a hill or something.
Like beef said...go 4.0 if you can.
__________________
HAD a 99 Ranger 4X4 3.0 flex, but I did the AWD Wagon Mod....now I am a proud owner of a Subaru Impreza wagon
|
05-31-2013, 12:53 PM
|
|
Ford Ranger Owner
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 59
|
|
Re: 3.0 Vs 4.0
I just bought my first ranger with the 3.0 knowing it is a low power engine (but a tank). I don't need the power of the 4.0 to drive in my area, it's flat. In a mountainous area the 4.0 would/is the best option especially needing/wanting 4x4.
__________________
95 Mustang GT 5.0 former daily drive of 11 yrs. now weekend toy.
99 Ranger XLT 3.0 new daily driver. Totaled 3/13/2015
00 Ranger Base model 4x4 3/28/2015
|
05-31-2013, 01:39 PM
|
|
To the Buggymobile!!
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 548
|
|
My buddy has a 3.0 in his truck, it gets 300 kilometers out of a tank, I have the same size gas tank on my older 4.0 and I get 450 km to a tank. IMO the 3.0 has the power of a 4 banger with the fuel consumption of a V10, lol
__________________
'93 Ranger XLT 4.0 A4LD 4x4 Single cab Long bed
TWIN STICK MOD!!!! best mod ever
Factory 3.27 gears with LSD
Multi Mile Wild country 32x11.5R15s on Alcoas
Remote start+Remote entry
Quote:
Originally Posted by beef_stew
Long bed > Level 2 haha!
|
|
05-31-2013, 01:45 PM
|
|
Psycho Pete
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,489
|
|
Re: 3.0 Vs 4.0
^^ he needs to take it in and get it fixed, whatever is wrong with it lol 300km or 186 miles a tank is awful for that truck. that's probably hurting performance, too.
|
|
|
|
05-31-2013, 02:06 PM
|
|
"Race Internals"
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,715
|
|
Re: 3.0 Vs 4.0
the 3.0 is probibly one of the easyist engines to work on that was offered in a ranger. plenty of room to move around under the hood, everything is fairly accessable without needing to pull wheels or half the engine apart. parts & labor costs are fairly cheap and easy to find. it's reliable (other than the killer cam sync gear issue) and very simple in design. and it's capable of getting 25+ MPG on the highway, although that mostly depends on how you drive and how it's geared (alot of 4.0 guys claim to get 25+ MPG on the highway too).
as for the 4.0's i don't know much about them, personally i would rather have one of the pre- '01 OHV 4.0's, again because of their simpeler design. they make less power than the 01+ SOHC 4.0, but the SOHC engine can be kinda a pain to work on and some have issues with the timing chains & gears. other than that though they are also very reliable from what i've seen.
__________________
2000 XLT 4X4, 3.0, Auto, regular cab - throttle cable mod, K&N drop in filter, taylor thundervolt 8.2 plug wires, autolite sparkplugs, Accel coil pack, AVS Ventshades, Rampage LED tailgate light bar, BFGoodrich All Terrain T/A tires, Trail F/X toolbox, cruse control pod light fix, Cobra 19 ultra II CB, lil wil antenna, pioneer door speakers, expo woodgrain radio bezal, 06+ mirrors & tails, powerdome hood
2000 XLT 4X4 Offroad, 4.0 / auto, supercab - the project truck!
|
|
|
|
05-31-2013, 03:21 PM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,373
|
|
Re: 3.0 Vs 4.0
You won't see 25mpg with either v6 unless your drive is mostly downhill and you have a stick. From my experiance with a auto and standard on a 3.0 best you will see is 23 hwy 17 city.
just click on my Fuelly log in my sig to see my trucks mpg.
__________________
1994 Ford Ranger 4.0L 5 speed 4wd
2009 Ford f150 4x4 v8
traded 2009 Mercury Mariner 2.5L I4 FWD
Sold:1996 Ford F150 4x4 300 6cyl 5 speed
Traded: 2003 Ford Ranger XLT Auto 3.0L V6 Flex fuel Extended Cab 2WD
|
05-31-2013, 03:27 PM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 584
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by huffa12
You won't see 25mpg with either v6 unless your drive is mostly downhill and you have a stick. From my experiance with a auto and standard on a 3.0 best you will see is 23 hwy 17 city.
just click on my Fuelly log in my sig to see my trucks mpg.
|
Haha yea I could only get that if it was in neutral the entire trip >< haha but I love my range either way!
Sent from my iPhone using FRF App
__________________
2009 Ford Ranger FX4
-4.10's, Black Leather Interior, Magnaflow Dual Turndowns Exhaust, K&N Air Filter, Torsion Bar Crank, PIAA Xtreme Headlights, Throttle Cable Mod, Air Silencer Mod, Pioneer 6x9s, Black Plastidipped Rims
-265/75/16 Wild Country XTX Sports
|
05-31-2013, 05:36 PM
|
|
"Race Internals"
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,715
|
|
Re: 3.0 Vs 4.0
sucks to be you guys then, lol. i average 19-20 running around local up and down the mountian all day, and 24-25 if i run the highway all week. and i've got a 4x4 with an auto!
__________________
2000 XLT 4X4, 3.0, Auto, regular cab - throttle cable mod, K&N drop in filter, taylor thundervolt 8.2 plug wires, autolite sparkplugs, Accel coil pack, AVS Ventshades, Rampage LED tailgate light bar, BFGoodrich All Terrain T/A tires, Trail F/X toolbox, cruse control pod light fix, Cobra 19 ultra II CB, lil wil antenna, pioneer door speakers, expo woodgrain radio bezal, 06+ mirrors & tails, powerdome hood
2000 XLT 4X4 Offroad, 4.0 / auto, supercab - the project truck!
|
05-31-2013, 05:38 PM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,373
|
|
Re: 3.0 Vs 4.0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skylark65
sucks to be you guys then, lol. i average 19-20 running around local up and down the mountian all day, and 24-25 if i run the highway all week. and i've got a 4x4 with an auto!
|
you must have an easy drive mostly flat? I'd love to get 25 mpg and i try my hardest but my drive is a bit hilly
__________________
1994 Ford Ranger 4.0L 5 speed 4wd
2009 Ford f150 4x4 v8
traded 2009 Mercury Mariner 2.5L I4 FWD
Sold:1996 Ford F150 4x4 300 6cyl 5 speed
Traded: 2003 Ford Ranger XLT Auto 3.0L V6 Flex fuel Extended Cab 2WD
|
05-31-2013, 05:43 PM
|
|
Ranger Enthusiast
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,831
|
|
Re: 3.0 Vs 4.0
Quote:
Originally Posted by ckirsebom
So still on the hunt for my first ranger. I live in MN and really want the 4X4. can you guys give your opinions on 3.0 vs the 4.0? I keep hearing the 3.0 is a slug. But when shopping around I feel like the 3.0 is more popular. Also I keep hearing the 3.0 is a tank and will last forever. Thanks in advance for all your opinions!
|
The 3.0 may very well be more popular as it is the cheaper of the two. Plus, many people have bought/sold the 3.0 as simply a "V6" Ranger. Not everyone even knows both engine options exist.
The primary benefit to the 3.0 is that it's cheaper. The primary benefit to the 4.0 is that it's more powerful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-31-2013, 05:50 PM
|
|
"Race Internals"
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3,715
|
|
Re: 3.0 Vs 4.0
Quote:
Originally Posted by huffa12
you must have an easy drive mostly flat? I'd love to get 25 mpg and i try my hardest but my drive is a bit hilly
|
yeah the highway is pretty flat, a couple of good long hills but not too bad. local where i usually run is mostly mountians. it helps though i've learned what speeds to keep where the truck will run in O/D almost at idle for most of the trip.
i will admit too almost everyone i've personally known with a ranger is happy to get 20 MPG, with any engine / drivetrain combo! they are not always great on fuel, that's for sure. i just can't figure why
__________________
2000 XLT 4X4, 3.0, Auto, regular cab - throttle cable mod, K&N drop in filter, taylor thundervolt 8.2 plug wires, autolite sparkplugs, Accel coil pack, AVS Ventshades, Rampage LED tailgate light bar, BFGoodrich All Terrain T/A tires, Trail F/X toolbox, cruse control pod light fix, Cobra 19 ultra II CB, lil wil antenna, pioneer door speakers, expo woodgrain radio bezal, 06+ mirrors & tails, powerdome hood
2000 XLT 4X4 Offroad, 4.0 / auto, supercab - the project truck!
|
|
|
|
05-31-2013, 06:07 PM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,373
|
|
Re: 3.0 Vs 4.0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skylark65
yeah the highway is pretty flat, a couple of good long hills but not too bad. local where i usually run is mostly mountians. it helps though i've learned what speeds to keep where the truck will run in O/D almost at idle for most of the trip.
i will admit too almost everyone i've personally known with a ranger is happy to get 20 MPG, with any engine / drivetrain combo! they are not always great on fuel, that's for sure. i just can't figure why
|
what gears do you have? i have 3.73's limited slip. not the greatest for hwy
I also should add I have to merge onto the hwy 3 different times on the way to and from that eats the gas
__________________
1994 Ford Ranger 4.0L 5 speed 4wd
2009 Ford f150 4x4 v8
traded 2009 Mercury Mariner 2.5L I4 FWD
Sold:1996 Ford F150 4x4 300 6cyl 5 speed
Traded: 2003 Ford Ranger XLT Auto 3.0L V6 Flex fuel Extended Cab 2WD
|
05-31-2013, 06:16 PM
|
|
Like the Forums
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 35
|
|
Re: 3.0 Vs 4.0
I like the 3.0 because Ford made millions of these engines and installed them in cars and trucks, easy to work on and the parts are much cheaper. When I was shopping I did not care what engine unless it was a V6. I always thought that the 4.0 was standard on 4x4 and the 3.0 was for the 2-wd
__________________
Sold my 2008 Big mistake.
No matter how much you like doing something if you are getting paid "It's a Job"
|
|
|