|
06-30-2011, 07:33 AM
|
|
Jeep recovery vehicle
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,186
|
|
Re: 3.0 vs 4.0
Yea and the 4.0 can get 20+ with a stick as well. The auto kind of kills it.
If you want to compare everything else as well
4.0 comes with the 5r55 or HD manual and 8.8"
3.0 comes with a 5r44 or standard manual and the 7.5"
So nothing in the drivetrain is better with the 3.0 either.
|
Register and never see these ads again. |
|
06-30-2011, 07:35 AM
|
|
OIF Veteran
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,044
|
|
Re: 3.0 vs 4.0
Quote:
Originally Posted by dixie_boysles
hmmm, i stand corrected. However, i have seen alot of 3.0ers claim to get 20-21 mpgs. So i dk. Did you get that before the 32s?
|
hell ive squeezed 22 MPG's out of my 4.0 on 33's! not too bad IMO.
__________________
2001 Ranger 4x4 Stepside
-RCD Suspension lift
-33x12.5 BFG KM2's on Mickey Thomson classic locks
-4:56 gears
-Auburn gear LS
-James Duff traction bars
-Headers
-Flowmaster duals
-SCT X-Cal2 and some small exterior mods
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2321189
2005 F-150 Lariat 4x4
- LED third brake light
-Weathertech floor liners
-Edge tuner
|
06-30-2011, 09:15 AM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,273
|
|
Re: 3.0 vs 4.0
Quote:
Originally Posted by dixie_boysles
hmmm, i stand corrected. However, i have seen alot of 3.0ers claim to get 20-21 mpgs. So i dk. Did you get that before the 32s?
|
I actually get the same wih my 32's as I did with the stockers. But I also have 4.10 gears and a tuner that I got the same time as the tires. 16 is also my daily driving average. I worked out at the beach one week and drove the freeway 30 miles one way each day with my 32's and averaged at 19 that week. Its all in the type of driving. But yeah, my average city/freeway mix is ~16.
|
06-30-2011, 10:52 AM
|
|
5.Oh All the way
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6,603
|
|
Re: 3.0 vs 4.0
Quote:
Originally Posted by 01_ranger_4x4
hell ive squeezed 22 MPG's out of my 4.0 on 33's! not too bad IMO.
|
BUT you have the mods to help with that lol
__________________
2014 F150 SuperCrew XLT 4x4
275/65/17 Falken Wildpeak AT3W | Shorty Antenna | Tinted Windows | ProClip Phone Mount |5.0 v8 |Tow Package | Oxford White
Sold/Totaled: 2006 Ranger XLT 2D SuperCap 4x4 Torch Red
15x8 Pacer 164P Polished Wheels | 31x10.50 BFG ATs | Level II Tow Hooks | FX4 Red Insert Seats
Tinted Windows | 6000K HIDs | Kobalt Low Profile Toolbox | Pioneer Speakers
|
06-30-2011, 11:41 AM
|
|
<--- Go Colts
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 334
|
|
Re: 3.0 vs 4.0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pasco08
I Shall post a couple of vids next time i race one or two.
Plus my single cab + lighter engine + duel exhausts and more power = More get up and go power then your heavy azz'ed 4.0
|
I have a single cab 4.0 with a performance tuner.... I'll take you on
__________________
2003 4.0L V6 Ford Ranger Regular cab
Modifications----> 20% side windows, 5%% Tinted rear window and front windsheild strip, , Diamond plated bed extender, Explorer sport Dome Light, Sony headunit, White Face Explorer Gauge Cluster.
|
06-30-2011, 12:38 PM
|
|
DirtFreeks Mtrspts #7299
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 180
|
|
Re: 3.0 vs 4.0
I have a 99 with a 3.0 and a 96 with a 4.0. Both are 2wd and extra cab. I use the 3.0 for commuting to Cali and back due to the mileage. The 4.0 is set up for desert with beams, coilovers, cage, etc etc. I enjoy both for what I use them for.
__________________
DirtFreeks Motorsports
|
06-30-2011, 12:47 PM
|
|
Blinded by the light
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,674
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pasco08
I Shall post a couple of vids next time i race one or two.
Plus my single cab + lighter engine + duel exhausts and more power = More get up and go power then your heavy azz'ed 4.0
|
I'm symbolically waving a BS flag too. And I find it hard to believe you've even races so many other Rangers to make that statement.
[Posted with my Android mobile device using Tapatalk Pro]
|
06-30-2011, 12:51 PM
|
|
Back in black (kinda)
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,276
|
|
Re: 3.0 vs 4.0
Quote:
Originally Posted by 01_ranger_4x4
hell ive squeezed 22 MPG's out of my 4.0 on 33's! not too bad IMO.
|
Damn.. thats good... the most i ever got outta my 3.slow was 22 mpg on a long trip with cruise control
__________________
00 Ford F-250...5.4L with some goodies, 4x4, Auto out of a 7.3 powerstroke w/ stage 2 TC , Crew Cab, Burnt orange, 35x12.5 MT Baja ATZ's on 20x10 Motometals, Pioneer Deck, Scanguage, Magnaflow exhaust, LED signal tow mirrors, and a Hidden hitch gooseneck
|
06-30-2011, 12:52 PM
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 14,046
|
|
Re: 3.0 vs 4.0
Quote:
Originally Posted by 01_ranger_4x4
hmm lets see, 3.0 has a cast iron black and heads, my 4.0 has cast iron block with aluminum heads and the two motors are about the same physical size, chances are the 4.0 is lighter. i would be willing to line up with any stock 3.0 at the track and put this BS to rest. the 3.0 is a good motor but its an absolute turd performance wise. oh yeah, having dual exhaust means nothing.
|
I agree!!
|
06-30-2011, 01:00 PM
|
|
Old man driver.
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 14,894
|
|
Re: 3.0 vs 4.0
4.0.
3.0 is just too slow
__________________
2001 Ranger Edge 4x4 (sold)
2006 F150 Lariat 4x4 (sold)
2007 Explorer XLT (Destroyed by Deer on highway)
2014 Explorer XLT (inherited from parents)
|
06-30-2011, 03:16 PM
|
N/A
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9,031
|
|
Re: 3.0 vs 4.0
hmmm pasco...
3L 147Hp and 183lb feet of torque
4L SOHC 207 HP and 238 lb feet,
3L stock out pacing a 4L is SHENANIGANS lol
|
06-30-2011, 03:27 PM
|
|
Ford Pickup
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 110
|
|
Re: 3.0 vs 4.0
I beat my friends that have 4.0's(extra cab/auto/long bed) lol. I average 21ish mpg towing a loaded trailer(2500lbs) everyday for work and it does it no problem.
__________________
04 Ranger Edge 3.0L 2wd 5speed, Cranked T-bars, 31x10.5, 5% tint, Vinyl Blacked Out Rear Window, Tinted lights, Painted Black Radio Bezel/Rims, Black Headliner, Custom Tailgate Stereo, 1000watt Hifonics amp on a P.A., C.B. radio.
|
06-30-2011, 03:53 PM
|
|
Old man driver.
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 14,894
|
|
Re: 3.0 vs 4.0
LOL another Florida member claiming their 3.0 can beat a 4.0 in a race.
__________________
2001 Ranger Edge 4x4 (sold)
2006 F150 Lariat 4x4 (sold)
2007 Explorer XLT (Destroyed by Deer on highway)
2014 Explorer XLT (inherited from parents)
|
06-30-2011, 03:55 PM
|
N/A
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9,031
|
|
Re: 3.0 vs 4.0
Quote:
Originally Posted by machine090767
LOL another Florida member claiming their 3.0 can beat a 4.0 in a race.
|
must be the vitamin C in the orange juice instead of 87 octane
|
06-30-2011, 04:06 PM
|
|
Jeep recovery vehicle
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,186
|
|
Re: 3.0 vs 4.0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rango88
hmmm pasco...
3L 147Hp and 183lb feet of torque
4L SOHC 207 HP and 238 lb feet,
3L stock out pacing a 4L is SHENANIGANS lol
|
sure it can 4.10s in the 3.0 and 3.27s in the 4.0 but thats a stretch
|
|
|