|
10-18-2014, 02:52 PM
|
|
Still around
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,298
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho99ranger
wrong again, if iyou think it would look like crap then speak up. Good, bad, or indifferent I wanted opinions on how it would all look. Now we are stuck with a useless thread of arguing about capabilities and nothing else lol.
|
Fine, I don't like Rangers with flatbeds.
__________________
2011 Ranger XLT 4x4 3.73 8.8" Trac-lok #1 T-bars, K -springs, LineX bedliner, General Grabber AT2's, Tonnopro tri-fold, CoverKing Realtree AP seat covers, OEM pre-keys, axle spacers, Bilstein 4600's, Hellwig AAL. Ziebart Undercoat
'98 Ranger XLT 2WD (sold)
|
Register and never see these ads again. |
|
10-18-2014, 02:55 PM
|
|
Ford Tough
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 280
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 99Ranger376
Fine, I don't like Rangers with flatbeds.
|
I assume you are not alone or every member would have one, and thank you for your opinion.
__________________
1999 ranger ext cab 5 speed with 3.0
2012 3500 dodge cummins
|
10-18-2014, 09:45 PM
|
|
Mr H....A....P...P....Y👿
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,911
|
|
Re: crazy off the wall idea
I say go for it, they look good when done right. There were a few members on here that had flatbed.
Building a flatbed!
__________________
2014 F150 xl 3.7 6 speed auto.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pk9298
HELL TO THE NO!! Abort abort abort!! That's the first thing to go!!! Ewwwww! I'm not no vampire! I don't enjoy red tea
|
Last edited by stateranger; 10-18-2014 at 09:55 PM.
|
10-18-2014, 10:04 PM
|
|
I almost bought a chevy
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,727
|
|
Flatbed? Good idea.
Gooseneck trailer? Bad idea
Just imo
__________________
1996 ranger 3.0 extended cab 2wd straight shift SOLD 6/13/15
2003 f150 4.2 regular cab 2wd straight shift still in the driveway
1998 f150 4.2 regular cab 2wd automatic daily driver
|
10-19-2014, 06:16 AM
|
|
♖
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,444
|
|
..
__________________
2006 Mazda B4000 parked in a snowbank behind a shop somewhere
Last edited by Dye Guardian; 10-19-2014 at 07:14 PM.
|
10-19-2014, 06:42 AM
|
|
Sold this bish, no regret
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,633
|
|
Re: crazy off the wall idea
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho99ranger
wrong again, if iyou think it would look like crap then speak up. Good, bad, or indifferent I wanted opinions on how it would all look. Now we are stuck with a useless thread of arguing about capabilities and nothing else lol.
|
Flatbed yes, gooseneck no.
Better?
__________________
2002 Blue Edge <-- Retired off road toy
3.0 Automatic, 2wd, 4:56's, 35x12.5 Kuhmo's, Lifted 2x, and more. TOTM July 2015
2002 Jeep TJ <-- NEW off road toy!
2.5L 5-spd, Skyjacker 4.5", 4:56's, Aussie Lockers, 33x12.5's, and more.
Build Thread --> http://www.fordrangerforum.com/proje...blue-edge.html
Youtube --> https://www.youtube.com/user/smashlizard
Last edited by 02BLUEdge; 10-19-2014 at 06:44 AM.
|
10-19-2014, 06:55 AM
|
|
I almost bought a chevy
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,727
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 02BLUEdge
Flatbed yes, gooseneck no. Better?
|
0P, I think this is the general consensus you're going to get
__________________
1996 ranger 3.0 extended cab 2wd straight shift SOLD 6/13/15
2003 f150 4.2 regular cab 2wd straight shift still in the driveway
1998 f150 4.2 regular cab 2wd automatic daily driver
|
|
|
|
10-19-2014, 06:04 PM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 9,686
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tredeh
That's retarded dude, but at least do a 302 swap if you're gonna do it because the 3.0 ain't gonna cut it
|
I beg to differ. I pull that kind of weight with my 2.3 all the time and it's fine and has been fine. And yes I have an auto with lift and 31s too. I pull a 5x12 trailer with a lot of added steel, 2 full sized atvs, generator, 3-4 gas cans and added stuff in the bed and my truck is fine. His 3.0 will be fine with that side by side. The goose neck is a good idea. Not sure about the airbags on the trailer but I think it's a cool idea.
----------
There's nothing wrong with a gooseneck trailer on a ranger. He is building the trailer to fit the side by side. So it's not gonna be a big trailer. Pulling from a goose neck will distribute the weight better over the axle of the truck instead of hanging off the back.
__________________
1997 B2300 reg cab 2.3 Lima, 15x8.5 Mickey Thompson classic 2, 31x10.50 cooper discover at3, 7.5 open 4.10 rear, dynomax super turbo catback, alpine iva-w200 w/ nav, kicker 6x8s, alpine type R 8, alpine 250W mono amp, power bass 400.4, tool box & camper shell, compustar alarm/remote start.
1956 Ford F100 rust bucket with big plans!
|
|
|
|
10-19-2014, 06:25 PM
|
|
Love me some Axels
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 10,456
|
|
Hey hey hey! I'm the one who's got the crazy off the wall ideas here. But your idea. I like it. Do it. Be different.
__________________
2020 KW T800
Quad Axle Dump Truck
MX13 PACAR I6
The Lone Ranger
|
|
|
|
10-19-2014, 06:39 PM
|
|
Ford Tough
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 280
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by casey.mikl
I beg to differ. I pull that kind of weight with my 2.3 all the time and it's fine and has been fine. And yes I have an auto with lift and 31s too. I pull a 5x12 trailer with a lot of added steel, 2 full sized atvs, generator, 3-4 gas cans and added stuff in the bed and my truck is fine. His 3.0 will be fine with that side by side. The goose neck is a good idea. Not sure about the airbags on the trailer but I think it's a cool idea. ---------- There's nothing wrong with a gooseneck trailer on a ranger. He is building the trailer to fit the side by side. So it's not gonna be a big trailer. Pulling from a goose neck will distribute the weight better over the axle of the truck instead of hanging off the back.
|
Yeah the airbags would be cool but alot of work and highly likely to be problematic so ive scrapped that portion of my plan.
__________________
1999 ranger ext cab 5 speed with 3.0
2012 3500 dodge cummins
|
|
|
|
10-19-2014, 06:42 PM
|
|
Love me some Axels
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 10,456
|
|
Do this but put some super singles on the rear. If your a trucker you'll understand. But what a super single is, is a single tire that is the width of a dual tire set up. They are great for Long hauls but winter snow traction sucks ass. Cause so much surface area
__________________
2020 KW T800
Quad Axle Dump Truck
MX13 PACAR I6
The Lone Ranger
|
10-19-2014, 07:17 PM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 9,686
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pk9298
Do this but put some super singles on the rear. If your a trucker you'll understand. But what a super single is, is a single tire that is the width of a dual tire set up. They are great for Long hauls but winter snow traction sucks ass. Cause so much surface area
|
That's ugly lol. But super singles are sweet!
__________________
1997 B2300 reg cab 2.3 Lima, 15x8.5 Mickey Thompson classic 2, 31x10.50 cooper discover at3, 7.5 open 4.10 rear, dynomax super turbo catback, alpine iva-w200 w/ nav, kicker 6x8s, alpine type R 8, alpine 250W mono amp, power bass 400.4, tool box & camper shell, compustar alarm/remote start.
1956 Ford F100 rust bucket with big plans!
|
10-19-2014, 07:21 PM
|
|
Love me some Axels
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 10,456
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by casey.mikl
That's ugly lol. But super singles are sweet!
|
it is in that build way. But you could build it and lift it a bit and put a flat bed with headache rack and make a pretty decent truck
__________________
2020 KW T800
Quad Axle Dump Truck
MX13 PACAR I6
The Lone Ranger
|
10-19-2014, 08:17 PM
|
|
Ford Tough
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 280
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pk9298
it is in that build way. But you could build it and lift it a bit and put a flat bed with headache rack and make a pretty decent truck
|
A super single is nothing more than an extremely wide tire, they suck in the oilfield because of the amount of flats. I could go with a dually ranger lol.
__________________
1999 ranger ext cab 5 speed with 3.0
2012 3500 dodge cummins
|
10-19-2014, 08:21 PM
|
|
Love me some Axels
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 10,456
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idaho99ranger
A super single is nothing more than an extremely wide tire, they suck in the oilfield because of the amount of flats. I could go with a dually ranger lol.
|
yes they do. They're more for long haul dry box trailer hauling. And do it. 2 axle dualy set up.
__________________
2020 KW T800
Quad Axle Dump Truck
MX13 PACAR I6
The Lone Ranger
|
|
|