Ford Ranger Forum - Forums for Ford Ranger enthusiasts!

Go Back   Ford Ranger Forum - Forums for Ford Ranger enthusiasts! > >
Forgot Password? Join Us!

Welcome to Ford Ranger Forum

Thread Tools Search this Thread

Old 02-24-2011, 05:09 PM
More_Cowbell More_Cowbell is offline
Chrome Dont Get You Home
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,169
Default Re: 302 vs 351/400m

Fuel injection is harder to set up and I've never heard of a fuel injected 351m/400 so that would have to be carbed
1990 Ranger Extended Cab
2.9L V6 5 Speed Transmission
Planning to put a 347 and a T-5 in it eventually

Originally Posted by FireRanger View Post
It looks like someone attacked the front of the truck with a bedazzler.
Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2011, 05:26 PM
mazdaman222 mazdaman222 is offline
Liking the Ford Ranger Forum
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 19
Default Re: 302 vs 351/400m

ok what would it take to hook up a carbed engine?
Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2011, 10:04 AM
Psychopete Psychopete is offline
Psycho Pete
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,489
Default Re: 302 vs 351/400m

Figuring out the wiring of the ignition system, and splicing the wiring from the Ranger to that. All the parts you need are made for a 5.0L conversion, 351m/400 are BIG engines; they make a 5.0L look small in comparison. They take a lot of money to make power, but can make big power. Headers, steering, etc going to need to be custom and on you to figure out and fabricate. I actually had a 351m & C6 to swap in, but I traded them both for a running 5.0L and got an AOD from the junk yard.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Want a 302 southbama man 8-Cylinder Tech 12 10-17-2010 10:22 AM
302. Sam French 8-Cylinder Tech 11 09-12-2010 07:12 PM
For Sale: 351 v8 DEBO Engine & Drivetrain Parts 0 02-28-2010 06:57 PM
351 w help irishtown14 8-Cylinder Tech 1 11-26-2009 01:17 AM
351 FireFighter27 8-Cylinder Tech 1 09-10-2009 06:31 AM