|
04-14-2013, 09:08 AM
|
Liking the Ford Ranger Forum
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 16
|
|
94' 2.3L in place of a 95' 2.3?
Hey guys, tried a search, didn't find an exact answer.
I have a shot at getting a running, rebuildable 2.3L out of a 94' B2300. The guy wants $75. Would this work for my 95' ranger? The intake manifold looks different than mine, but maybe I can rebuild and use the longblock?
my engine still runs strong, has good oil pressure but I want to have an engine rebuilt and ready when it's time.
thanks!
-Marc
__________________
1995 Ford Ranger XL. Single Cab, short bed, 4x4. 2.3L 4cyl, 5spd, 1354m, manual hubs, 7.5 open in rear (soon to be 31spl 8.8 TL), dana 35/28 hybrid up front (soon to be dana 35 w/ TL), 4.10s. Factory lift blocks in the rear, Skyjacker leveling coils up front. Magnaflow cat, Dynomax Super Turbo Catback. 169K miles and counting....
|
Register and never see these ads again. |
|
|
|
|
04-14-2013, 09:18 AM
|
|
Mustang Owner
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 14,046
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 95LittleRanger
Hey guys, tried a search, didn't find an exact answer.
I have a shot at getting a running, rebuildable 2.3L out of a 94' B2300. The guy wants $75. Would this work for my 95' ranger? The intake manifold looks different than mine, but maybe I can rebuild and use the longblock?
my engine still runs strong, has good oil pressure but I want to have an engine rebuilt and ready when it's time.
thanks!
-Marc
|
Its the same motor
Sent from my iPhone 5 so I can tell you to search wherever I may be
__________________
2017 Lightning Blue Mustang GT PP 430/402
CJ Pony Parts Lowering Springs | Texas Speed Longtubes | PMAS CAI | Lund Tuned | Borla S-Type Catback
2013 F150 FX4 5.0 - Sold
1998 Jeep Wrangler TJ 4.0 5spd - Sold
2001 Mustang Bullitt - Sold
2005 Level II - Sold
2001 Integra GSR - Sold
1999 XLT - May 2013 TOTM - Totaled
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2004 fx4 level II
fuckin Nissan shhhiitttttttttt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
04-14-2013, 09:20 AM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,187
|
|
yup same engine
__________________
95 Ranger XLT 4x2 2.3 I4 5 speed 206,000 *dead*
96 Ranger XLT 4x4 4.0 V6 5 speed 173,000 *alive*
D35 front, 8.8 rear, 3.73 gears, limited slip rear diff
|
04-14-2013, 12:55 PM
|
Liking the Ford Ranger Forum
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 16
|
|
Re: 94' 2.3L in place of a 95' 2.3?
K good! Thx!
__________________
1995 Ford Ranger XL. Single Cab, short bed, 4x4. 2.3L 4cyl, 5spd, 1354m, manual hubs, 7.5 open in rear (soon to be 31spl 8.8 TL), dana 35/28 hybrid up front (soon to be dana 35 w/ TL), 4.10s. Factory lift blocks in the rear, Skyjacker leveling coils up front. Magnaflow cat, Dynomax Super Turbo Catback. 169K miles and counting....
|
|
|
|
04-14-2013, 01:22 PM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,268
|
|
Re: 94' 2.3L in place of a 95' 2.3?
Quote:
Originally Posted by 95LittleRanger
Hey guys, tried a search, didn't find an exact answer.
I have a shot at getting a running, rebuildable 2.3L out of a 94' B2300. The guy wants $75. Would this work for my 95' ranger? The intake manifold looks different than mine, but maybe I can rebuild and use the longblock?
my engine still runs strong, has good oil pressure but I want to have an engine rebuilt and ready when it's time.
thanks!
-Marc
|
it is the same engine, however, unless your 94 is a CA truck then it is obd-1. the 95 is OBD-2. the 95 has the oil pump where the aux gear(timing belt) is on the 94......The 95 has a cam sensor behind the oilpump........I am not sure where the oilpump is on the 94 or how you go about resolving this issue....you probably will end up swapping the 95 intake over......
__________________
2004 Ext Cab, 4WD, 4.0, Auto, 154k. (4.0 engine is out of a 2009 Ranger w/96k) ( as of 7/1/2017)
2004 Ranger, Ext Cab, 2WD, 3.0, 5 speed , 4WABS, crank windows, no cruise, Edge 116k.(6/5,2014) (SOLD).
1999 Ford Ranger, Reg Cab, 2.5, 5 speed, 2WD, no AC, 150k (SOLD).
Last edited by modelageek; 04-14-2013 at 01:24 PM.
|
|
|
|
04-14-2013, 07:27 PM
|
Liking the Ford Ranger Forum
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 16
|
|
Re: 94' 2.3L in place of a 95' 2.3?
Quote:
Originally Posted by modelageek
it is the same engine, however, unless your 94 is a CA truck then it is obd-1. the 95 is OBD-2. the 95 has the oil pump where the aux gear(timing belt) is on the 94......The 95 has a cam sensor behind the oilpump........I am not sure where the oilpump is on the 94 or how you go about resolving this issue....you probably will end up swapping the 95 intake over......
|
Interesting
...i have more research to do. Thanks!
__________________
1995 Ford Ranger XL. Single Cab, short bed, 4x4. 2.3L 4cyl, 5spd, 1354m, manual hubs, 7.5 open in rear (soon to be 31spl 8.8 TL), dana 35/28 hybrid up front (soon to be dana 35 w/ TL), 4.10s. Factory lift blocks in the rear, Skyjacker leveling coils up front. Magnaflow cat, Dynomax Super Turbo Catback. 169K miles and counting....
|
|
|