Ford Ranger Forum - Forums for Ford Ranger enthusiasts!

Go Back   Ford Ranger Forum - Forums for Ford Ranger enthusiasts! > >
Forgot Password? Join Us!
FRF Store Register Ranger Pictures Community Today's Posts Search

Welcome to Ford Ranger Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread

  #1  
Old 08-20-2012, 01:08 AM
Rodmanriot Rodmanriot is offline
Learning to use the forums
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2
Default Is a 2.3L with stock suspention decent for offroading?

I have a 2003 ranger with a 2.3L engine. I recently got 30" bighorn tires and had to get a bodylift to stop the tired from rubbing on the body. Would this truck be decent for some offroading or should i just keep the tires for looks and stick to the streets?
__________________
2wd 2003 2.3L regular cab ranger
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-30-2012, 08:26 AM
chaffinyo chaffinyo is offline
Liking the Ford Ranger Forum
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 26
Default Re: Is a 2.3L with stock suspention decent for offroading?

It's up to you man. I have a 97 reg cab 2.3 with 5 speed, and it's a freakin blast, I'm half assedly making a pre runner, I plan on bigger suspension just cause of the weak rear springs. ( EDIT) also what 19Delta says

Last edited by chaffinyo; 08-30-2012 at 11:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-30-2012, 08:38 AM
19Delta 19Delta is offline
Hunter of Men
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 165
Default Re: Is a 2.3L with stock suspention decent for offroading?

Well I guess it depends on the type of off roading your looking to do. Where I live it would do just fine, but other areas not hardly so it just deppends man. Either way it does have potential to be really good so long as your not needing to do massive hill climbs.
__________________
91 Ranger 4.0L
5spd
ext cab
4x4
sylvania ultras
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-30-2012, 07:21 PM
JakeThompso JakeThompso is offline
Liking the Ford Ranger Forum
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 25
Default Re: Is a 2.3L with stock suspention decent for offroading?

honestly, its better to wait and get new springs and or a lift. i have a 92 2.3 that i used to wheel stock and it messed up my shocks and my steering. now i got a 4 inch rough country lift with a pro comp steering stabilizer and nitrogen shocks and its 1000 times smoother and i dont have to worry about anything breaking. trust me, its well worth the wait
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-30-2012, 07:30 PM
doyouquaxu doyouquaxu is offline
Almost ******
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 7,466
Default Re: Is a 2.3L with stock suspention decent for offroading?

do a real lift, not a body lift. the suspension components are too week to handle rigorous off roading.
__________________
Why does everyone think prerunners just jump stuff?


Please click HERE to watch this video!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-30-2012, 10:29 PM
19Delta 19Delta is offline
Hunter of Men
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 165
Default

If a body lift is what is needed for your type of wheeling then go with that. There are pros and cons to either type of lift, On my hunting rig all I need is my body lift but on my search and rescue rig I run both a body lift and suspension lift. So really in my opinion you should pick the lift that works for what you need.
__________________
91 Ranger 4.0L
5spd
ext cab
4x4
sylvania ultras
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-30-2012, 10:39 PM
DustyXB DustyXB is offline
Everybody Loves Me
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,565
Default

Id say a 2.3 is just fine. I got a buddy with a 95 2.3 2wd with some springs and shocks all around. It mobs just fine. Add an actual suspension lift and maybe a little bit bigger tires and you'll be solid.
__________________
1993 Twin stick XLT 4.0L. 3.73 8.8LS LED's here and there. Plasti-dip lower half. Sony HU. Image Dynamic 5x7 all around. 12" Sony sub. 200,000 club
Build Thread
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-05-2012, 05:59 PM
Rodmanriot Rodmanriot is offline
Learning to use the forums
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2
Default Re: Is a 2.3L with stock suspention decent for offroading?

Thanks guys. Really helps to have others opintions. Im a college freshman right now and im still trying to have fun with my truck in between. Any sugestions on what i should do to improve the preformance but not use up my entire bank account?
__________________
2wd 2003 2.3L regular cab ranger
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-05-2012, 06:55 PM
DustyXB DustyXB is offline
Everybody Loves Me
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,565
Default

Cheapest thing that you'll actually notice is regearing it. Make it a little more peppy. Might lose some of the economy but can't have one without the other.
__________________
1993 Twin stick XLT 4.0L. 3.73 8.8LS LED's here and there. Plasti-dip lower half. Sony HU. Image Dynamic 5x7 all around. 12" Sony sub. 200,000 club
Build Thread
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-06-2012, 02:30 AM
kiyomiyo kiyomiyo is offline
Ford Tough
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 240
Default Re: Is a 2.3L with stock suspention decent for offroading?

If the suspension is anything like my 96,
and my friend's 93 You'll destroy the stock suspension easily, it's really only meant for at most dirt roads, or somewhat rocky roads.

I have a hard enough time driving my V6 4.0 2WD in snow with the center of weight it has, I can't imagine trying to off road in one, I'd see having Front wheel pull as being vital for climbing or getting unstuck from mud,
I can't even get the truck to climb forward onto vehicle ramps when On dirt or grass, the rear wheels just spin and spin unless I put several sandbags into the bed to give the rear wheels grip.
__________________
When posting from my phone my typing is horrible.....

Last edited by kiyomiyo; 09-06-2012 at 02:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-06-2012, 07:47 AM
chaffinyo chaffinyo is offline
Liking the Ford Ranger Forum
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 26
Default Re: Is a 2.3L with stock suspention decent for offroading?

I agree with the regearing, and I would throw an aftermarket muffler on her, try a glasspack, almost every parts store has them
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-06-2012, 07:58 AM
HazardousRanger HazardousRanger is offline
Hazardous to Your Health!
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9,992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiyomiyo
If the suspension is anything like my 96,
and my friend's 93 You'll destroy the stock suspension easily, it's really only meant for at most dirt roads, or somewhat rocky roads.

I have a hard enough time driving my V6 4.0 2WD in snow with the center of weight it has, I can't imagine trying to off road in one, I'd see having Front wheel pull as being vital for climbing or getting unstuck from mud,
I can't even get the truck to climb forward onto vehicle ramps when On dirt or grass, the rear wheels just spin and spin unless I put several sandbags into the bed to give the rear wheels grip.
What the fuck. That is a result of shitty ass tires. Im 2wd, been stuck once. I just completed 100 miles off roading with rocks, gravel, many many drainage ditches that,my bumper barely cleared and I never wheel spun once.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by HazardousRanger

referring to the dirt/grass part

What the fuck. That is a result of shitty ass tires. Im 2wd, been stuck once. I just completed 100 miles off roading with rocks, gravel, many many drainage ditches that,my bumper barely cleared and I never wheel spun once.
..

----------

..

----------

Fucked up the post but anyways,I made my point.
__________________
Ford Ranger Edge Supercab, 2004 3.0 Auto, 2WD, 4.10 Axle 31x10.5x15 BF Goodrich All Terrain T/A KO's


My Truck Is My Mountain Bike's Ride!

Class III hitch, Rhino Bedliner, Almost Maxed T-Bar Crank, Tuff Country Add A Leaf, Custom Low Anchor Points, OEM ('99) Tow Hooks, Pro Comp Offroad Lights , Mustang Dome Light, Clear Corners, Slim Toolbox, Blinker Mod,Cargo Brake Light Mod,Expo Lighted Visors, Ultra Silverstar heads/fogs, Fog/high mod, Reverse/switched lights, Bike Fork Mounts
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-06-2012, 10:35 AM
DustyXB DustyXB is offline
Everybody Loves Me
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,565
Default

Yeah having 4wd is really only helpful when you get stuck. Unless you're rock crawling and I haven't seen too many rock crawling rangers out there.

Try taking those ramps a little faster... like 40 lol:thumbup:
__________________
1993 Twin stick XLT 4.0L. 3.73 8.8LS LED's here and there. Plasti-dip lower half. Sony HU. Image Dynamic 5x7 all around. 12" Sony sub. 200,000 club
Build Thread
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-06-2012, 11:05 AM
RoberticusMaximus RoberticusMaximus is offline
<<< Husky the High Dog!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,181
Default Re: Is a 2.3L with stock suspention decent for offroading?

you know, sometimes i can piss on the grass under my rear tire and get stuck lol!

but then again, it does pretty well for a truck in a little mud or snow and ice with some weight in the bed.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-06-2012, 10:19 PM
kiyomiyo kiyomiyo is offline
Ford Tough
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 240
Default Re: Is a 2.3L with stock suspention decent for offroading?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HazardousRanger View Post
What the fuck. That is a result of shitty ass tires. Im 2wd, been stuck once. I just completed 100 miles off roading with rocks, gravel, many many drainage ditches that,my bumper barely cleared and I never wheel spun once.

----------

..

----------

..

----------

Fucked up the post but anyways,I made my point.
Seems to be more the weight on the axel than the tires, but a few sandbags fixes that.
__________________
When posting from my phone my typing is horrible.....
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2.3l, 2003 ford ranger, off road



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stock. 4x4 sport wheels and suspention. hyperjuno Wheels and Tires 6 06-13-2012 09:58 AM
suspention problems!! aceatrace Suspension Tech 0 01-14-2012 01:09 PM
suspention opinions Erockerock Suspension Tech 6 08-04-2011 04:42 PM
Craigslist / eBay Find: Decent tires and wheels.. Decent price MTman777 Tire & Wheel Items 6 04-10-2011 07:44 PM
suspention lift for an '00 4x4? Skylark65 Lifted Suspension 4 11-23-2010 05:49 PM