Re: Opinions needed on possible Mods 2.3L
Yeah, I used "turbo" as a substitute for any kind of airflow varying equipment(Turbo, super, intakes, exhausts) and the like. People seem to favor the use of Turbochargers around where I live so that was a slip. Either way, short of making my truck look like a sperm because of all the aerodynamic mods that are on ecomodder, what do you guys think of the other things I had on my list?
Also, what do you mean by this:
"If you want to spend tons of money rapidly breaking your motor, then I suggest a supercharger, it'll give you a bit more edge on takeoff, no lag."?
I can't see a super breaking an engine like the one in the Ranger. it may be relatively small, but they are built to withstand higher pressures anyways. The weakest parts of my engine are the head gasket and the seals around the intakes just because of age. I would hope that the extra boost wouldn't be sufficient to hurt the engine, but then again, I'm completely new to modding and all that goes with it. Thanks for the head's up though.
__________________
The vehicle chooses the driver. We all have our own preferences in what we WANT in a vehicle, but only the right vehicle knows what we NEED.
|