|
|
|
|
05-04-2011, 06:43 PM
|
|
2008 XLT 4x4
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 86
|
|
Volant Cold Air Intakes
I know this general topic has been discussed adnauseam but this design intrigues me because it adds the additional filter area in a still sealed box.
I am purely after mpgs. It looks like a 2-3mpg custom tune only means going from 15 to 16.5mpg and if there is ANY wind, my H/W mileage can actually be worse. I mean it's better under ideal conditions, no wind 68-70mph max, but I had a H/W test on my new custom tune and the wind was 25mph out of the south so going north I was helped by it and coming back hurt by it, fillled up and got 16.5mpg. My previous tank was 3/4 city 1/4 H/W and it was 16.5mpg - was just 15mpg prior to the SCT tune. This is just simply horrible. Though I never grew to like the truck, my GMC Canyon 4x4 would average better than 18 and would get 22/23 on the H/W. My V8 Sierra would do better than this Ranger.
So, looking to go ALL synthetic from the engine to the rear end.
I am considering this intake and perhaps a catback system as well.
Still think I've got an engine problem of some kind though to be this bad. My foot is not that heavy.
Yet, I've seen others posting 12-14mpg. Guess I should have done my homework before buying this but I just assumed a 6 cylinder compact would have respectable mileage especially with an additional gear.
thoughts?
__________________
Garth
2011 Ford F150 XLT 4x4 EcoBoost, Gray/Silver
2005 Volvo XC90 [more than just a grocery getter!]
1987 Olds 442 27K Original Miles
|
|
|
|
Register and never see these ads again. |
|
05-04-2011, 06:48 PM
|
|
Blinded by the light
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,674
|
|
Re: Volant Cold Air Intakes
The MPG could definitely be better. However adding that useless shiny tube will not improve anything including the MPG. Neither will the catback exhaust. You should not be expecting more than 18-19. And that 2mph lacking can be attributed to a lot of things. Honestly the biggest thing is driving style.
|
05-04-2011, 06:55 PM
|
|
2008 XLT 4x4
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 86
|
|
Re: Volant Cold Air Intakes
Well, that's just it. You aren't going to find much better driving style.
So, if 16.5mpg is all I'm going to get even with a custom tune, this truck is gone.
__________________
Garth
2011 Ford F150 XLT 4x4 EcoBoost, Gray/Silver
2005 Volvo XC90 [more than just a grocery getter!]
1987 Olds 442 27K Original Miles
|
05-04-2011, 07:04 PM
|
|
Blinded by the light
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,674
|
|
Re: Volant Cold Air Intakes
How many miles on the plugs?
|
05-04-2011, 07:06 PM
|
|
2008 XLT 4x4
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 86
|
|
Re: Volant Cold Air Intakes
For those that haven't seen the Volant version.
http://volant.com/edetail.asp?ID=495
__________________
Garth
2011 Ford F150 XLT 4x4 EcoBoost, Gray/Silver
2005 Volvo XC90 [more than just a grocery getter!]
1987 Olds 442 27K Original Miles
|
05-04-2011, 07:11 PM
|
|
Ford Ranger Driver
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 591
|
|
Re: Volant Cold Air Intakes
That Volant says it is for the 3.0L, not sure if the 4.0 and 3.0 have interchangable intakes but I'd doubt it. 16.5 is pretty good for a 4.0. I get between 15-17 with my 4.0, 5spd manual.
__________________
2006 Fx4 Level 2 with a 5spd, Superlifted on 33's.
|
05-04-2011, 07:20 PM
|
|
Blinded by the light
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,674
|
|
Re: Volant Cold Air Intakes
Quote:
Originally Posted by canonmutant
|
Looks like a more expensive version of the stock intake. The only thing you will gain is a thinner wallet. MPG is all about keeping the truck properly maintained and driving style. You do not bolt on MPG.
|
05-04-2011, 07:25 PM
|
N/A
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9,031
|
|
Re: Volant Cold Air Intakes
Quote:
Originally Posted by FireRanger
Looks like a more expensive version of the stock intake. The only thing you will gain is a thinner wallet. MPG is all about keeping the truck properly maintained and driving style. You do not bolt on MPG.
|
lol fireranger, do you get tired of repeating the same facts in the smae threads? How many more till you tire yourself and copy paste
|
05-04-2011, 07:29 PM
|
|
Blinded by the light
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,674
|
|
Re: Volant Cold Air Intakes
Clearly not as tired as I should be. For some reason I care too much about seeing people waste their money on useless products that don't work.
|
05-04-2011, 07:30 PM
|
N/A
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9,031
|
|
Re: Volant Cold Air Intakes
Quote:
Originally Posted by FireRanger
Clearly not as tired as I should be. For some reason I care too much about seeing people waste their money on useless products that don't work.
|
Good on you bud for informing the ignorant
|
|
|
|
05-04-2011, 07:31 PM
|
|
2008 XLT 4x4
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 86
|
|
Re: Volant Cold Air Intakes
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt224
That Volant says it is for the 3.0L, not sure if the 4.0 and 3.0 have interchangable intakes but I'd doubt it. 16.5 is pretty good for a 4.0. I get between 15-17 with my 4.0, 5spd manual.
|
Volant doesn't have a picture for the 4.0 so I just pasted that one. Figured it would be similar.
I didn't like the open air design of the K&N and Airaid because of the risk of getting water or something else in it.
This thing is at least sealed while still maintaining the extra filter area.
And, like I said, if 16.5 is all I am going to yield out of this truck, it's gone, plain and simple. My post just put up on a vibration/growl I developed on the way home today probably means that something ain't right. Now the engine runs smooth, no missing, bogging, coughing, etc. but a vibration/growl means something ain't right and is not spinning as smoothly as it should which may adversely affect mpg.
It's just strange that some people swear by these things at others just swear at them.
__________________
Garth
2011 Ford F150 XLT 4x4 EcoBoost, Gray/Silver
2005 Volvo XC90 [more than just a grocery getter!]
1987 Olds 442 27K Original Miles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-04-2011, 07:35 PM
|
N/A
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 9,031
|
|
Re: Volant Cold Air Intakes
Quote:
Originally Posted by canonmutant
Volant doesn't have a picture for the 4.0 so I just pasted that one. Figured it would be similar.
I didn't like the open air design of the K&N and Airaid because of the risk of getting water or something else in it.
This thing is at least sealed while still maintaining the extra filter area.
And, like I said, if 16.5 is all I am going to yield out of this truck, it's gone, plain and simple. My post just put up on a vibration/growl I developed on the way home today probably means that something ain't right. Now the engine runs smooth, no missing, bogging, coughing, etc. but a vibration/growl means something ain't right and is not spinning as smoothly as it should which may adversely affect mpg.
It's just strange that some people swear by these things at others just swear at them.
|
What type off diff do you have. If you have the 4.10, youre screwed, might as well sell it like you said if MPGs are your concern. the 3.73 is slightly better on gas but not by much. Trade it in for 2wd Ranger with the 2.3L and 5 spd manual.
|
|
|
|
05-04-2011, 07:42 PM
|
|
Blinded by the light
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,674
|
|
Re: Volant Cold Air Intakes
Everyone I have ever seen swear by them has yet to actually show any evidence of what they swear. There are however plenty of dyno tests and good old logic and science that to back swearing at them.
You bought a pickup truck. If you want super mileage, you bought the wrong vehicle.
|
05-04-2011, 07:43 PM
|
|
Alrighty then
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 593
|
|
Re: Volant Cold Air Intakes
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt224
That Volant says it is for the 3.0L, not sure if the 4.0 and 3.0 have interchangable intakes but I'd doubt it. 16.5 is pretty good for a 4.0. I get between 15-17 with my 4.0, 5spd manual.
|
Thats what i get normally in my ranger to. 15-17. unless im wheeling then it drops down to about 13 lol
|
05-04-2011, 08:20 PM
|
|
Lowered 00
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 765
|
|
Re: Volant Cold Air Intakes
get a f150, i have a 4x4 screw and get 15 -16 mpg, more power/room and just as good fuel milage
|
|
|