Thread: 3.0 vs. 4.0
View Single Post
 
Old 03-06-2017, 10:39 PM
Undrstm8ed Undrstm8ed is offline
Habenae Est Dominatus
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,846
Default Re: 3.0 vs. 4.0



And just extras..

https://www.youtube.com/results?sear...t+Ranger+Swaps

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evan_P View Post
It all comes down to how well it has been maintained. I see Rangers with with any engine make it to 250k with no problem at work. But I also see ones that need major engine work at 100k because they were neglected. Yes there are cases where they were taken care of just as they were supposed to be but had issues prematurely due to parts going bad long before they should have. On general however, if you take care of it it will take care of you. I say stick the 3.0 in it as it is the easiest and fastest swap. Then keep on top pf maintenance.
True,

My 93 4.0L is knocking on 338600 miles now; Original engine/Trans, its on its second clutch now (first one at 144k), I've only had to do brakes, Lower I/M gasket, and well I think Ive posted my 70 yards of near 3ft of water crossings enough now.. lol still going strong.
__________________
_______________________

My Build Pg. Threads
+ 93' Ranger Overlanding Build
+ 94' Ranger Bed Overlanding Trailer Build
+ 12 North Industries ~ I Support
Reply With Quote